Andrew Marvell’s – To His Coy Mistress

In Europe, the seventeenth century was a judgment of conviction that was c onlyed a part of the Renaissance (meaning rebirth), an era that was so called, beca phthisis it was a age in which learning and development in e rattling sphere of bread and butter occurred. This was prompted in part by the general reawakening to the idea that since life is temporary, one should make the most of ones life.This is why the carpe diem (seize the twenty-four hour period in Latin) authorship frequently occurs in the literature of the seventeenth century. This theme is of central brilliance in Andrew Marvells To His Coy schoolmarm as well as in Robert Herricks To the Virgins, to Make Much of magazine, and other than this theme, two poems shargon a number of similarities. However, there atomic number 18 also striking differences, which contribute to the undivided understanding of each poem.Carpe diem referred to all worldly pleasures, but theses two poems are similar in the focussing the y approach this theme. Although seize the day could mean all worldly pleasures, both of these poems emphasize cozy pleasure. Thus in Marvells poem, the loudspeaker addresses his modest mistress and tells her than in death, her long preserved virginity (Marvell line 28) get out mold to dust (29). Similarly, Herricks poem is addressed also to the Virgins who are told to be not coy (Herrick line 13).Also, both poems emphasize the pleasure to be gotten in ones youth, as Herricks poem negotiation of Youth (10), and Marvells poem mentions the immature hue (33). This shows that the speaker in both poems is intent on persuading these women that sexual pleasures are of most importance and are best when enjoyed in youth, and thus to be coy is naught but wasting eon, since life is short.Some comparisons and images are also universal to both poems. For example, the image of the sun is used in both poems that time is running outin lines 5-8 in To the Virgins, and lines 45-46 in To His C oy Mistress. season itself is also personified in both poems in To the Virgins, time is referred to as Old Time (2), and To His Coy Mistress, the speaker tells his mistress of Times wingd chariot (22), and urges her to make the most of time, quite than languish in his slow-chapped powr (40).Such a use of personification makes it easier to visualize time as a person, under whose forces are all people. Also, both poems compare the ladies to flowers and thus, again, emphasize their transience. In Herricks poem, in the first stanza, there is an indirect comparison of the virgins to the flower that Tomorrow will be dying (4). This is evident in line 3, where the flower is not said to be blooming, but smiling (2). In To His Coy Mistress, the youthful hue/Sits on the mistress like morning dew (33-34), as if she were a flower.Apart from these similarities, the two poems also watch significant differences, which contribute to the individual effectiveness of each. For example, To His Coy M istress is addressed to a single lady, and is very descriptive about why and how the speaker and the mistress should enjoy sexual pleasure. This is because the poem aims to persuade the lady into immediate action.On the other hand, To the Virgins, (as unmistakable by the title), addresses all Virgins and seeks to persuade them to go marry (14) and not balk marriage for later (not an immediate act). Thus, the poem has a song-like quality, brought out by the four short stanzas, as opposed to the long three sections of Marvells poem.This song-like quality in To the Virgins is also brought about by the a,b,a,b rhyme scheme, and the completeness of the lines. On the other hand, in To His Coy Mistress, there is and a,a,b,b,c,c rhyme scheme, but the lines are run-on. This lends a conversational air to the poem, which is in keeping with the speakers addressing a single lady.Andrew Marvell and Robert Herrick both wealthy person used veritable similar devices in their poems to bring out t hemes that are mutual to them. Yet, they have also employed devices which are peculiar to their own poems, and in doing so, have made them works of literature unique and complete in themselves, quite of stereotypical representations of a certain theme.Works CitedHerrick, Robert. To the Virgins to Make Much of Time. 1648. Poems to Remember. Ed. E. F. Kingston. Toronto J. M. notch & Sons. 1964. 22-23.Marvell, Andrew. To His Coy Mistress. 1681. The Norton Introduction to Literature. 8th ed. Ed. Jerome Be